Check out our new platform — https://thecapital.io/
In the US there has been a dramatic decline of Initial Public offerings (IPOs) with, according to The Economist, the average number falling between 1975- 2000 from 282 p.a. to only 118 between 2001–2019. According to Forbes, “The average age of a company going public these days is 12 years. In 1999, the median age of a company at IPO was just four years.”
One of the reasons for the decline in IPOs is the huge amount of capital that Venture Capital and Private Equity funds have managed to attract over the last few years. This has meant that, instead of floating on a public stock market, firms have turned to VC and PE investors to raise capital. According to Ernst & Young, only 12% of firms that have been sold by PE firms have carried out an IPO — the remainder has been typically sold to trade competitors. Those firms which have carried out IPOs are usually able to recruit more staff as they expand and grow (as the chart below indicates) with IPOs not only offering companies access to staff but also enabling private investors to have access to invest in what will hopefully be the next Amazon, Tencent or Google.
IPOs Finance Significant Job Creation
Certainly, there are signs that change is on the way as seen with the announcement that INX is about to float, having received regulatory permission from the SEC in the US. Indeed, INX will, itself, be the first Security Token Offer (STO) which can be sold to private investors in the US. Interestingly, the cost to INX for carrying out its IPO was only $6 million (i.e. just over 5%) compared to the average price of an IPO being 9% to 24% according to PWC. Clearly change needs to come given these massive IPO costs and the decline of IPOs. It is not just in the US that digital exchanges are being given permission to launch. In August 2020, the FCA in the UK granted approval to Archax and Gemini to offer regulated exchange services for Digital Assets. The ability to buy Digital Assets on a recognised exchange was one of the key parts of the regulatory infrastructure which has been missing for asset managers. Gemini is already trading in a variety of jurisdictions such as Canada, Hong Kong, and Singapore, with Archax meanwhile claiming it has 35 assets that it wishes to start trading. As a result, Archax will enable these to be traded digitally and made available for external investors, which will potentially make the assets easier to invest in by third parties.
An alternative to an IPO is when a company carries out a ‘private placement’ and typically sells some of its equity, not via a public offering but through a private offering, to a small number of selected investors. This method of raising capital usually negates the need for an underwriter thus involving less costs but, even so, as the chart below indicates it is still potentially 40% more expensive than carrying out an STO.
The cost of an STO v traditional private placement over 5 years
Source: Survey of Entoro Capital, STO legal counsel, S&P and Pitchbook
One of the biggest cost savings claimed above is ‘Ownership Transfers.’ These refer to the costs required for a transfer agent who keeps a record of share transactions and dealing with shareholders i.e. issuing, cancelling, handling lost share certificates, and investors mailings (such as sending copies of interim and annual accounts). This is a good example of how digitisation helps disintermediate traditional advisors, thus saving companies and, ultimately, shareholders’ money. Possibly it is of even greater significance, digitised securities allow exchanges and regulators to be able to monitor shareholder activity in real-time. Therefore, in theory, using smart contracts regulators can identify suspicious activity and report directors dealing i.e. bring far greater transparency. Currently, if you wish to see who the owners of a publicly-traded company on any stock exchange in the world are you are required to wait until the stock exchange (where the shares are traded) is closed, the share registrar updated and the records adjusted for any transactions have occurred during the day……
Advantages of STO v IPO
There are several reasons why an STO is seen as being more favourable than an IPO, which include:
· reduction of issuance costs — STOs are launched using Blockchain technology, meaning Smart Contracts are used. This eliminates many of the traditional intermediary fees whilst improving the compliance controls and reducing risks, as many of the steps required to raise capital can be automated and inspected on a real-time basis;
· direct access to investors — STOs enable companies to deal directly with investors as opposed to being reliant on asset managers and investment banks, which not only reduces the costs of issuing fresh equity but disintermediates the process. STOs rely on Blockchain technology, which offers greater transparency and automated pre -investors certification, potentially enabling companies to target a wider range of investors as opposed to simply the high net worth and institutional clients;
· access to international investors — investors into IPOs are usually targeted within the jurisdictions in which the business is based, thus ignoring other investors around the world. STOs can potentially resolve this by investors conceding to be treated as local persons or entities under the jurisdiction of issuance of the token. For example, if EU citizens wished to invest in EDSX, which is based in Switzerland, they would have to give consent to be treated as a local Swiss resident and undergo Swiss KYC checks;
· digital engagement — younger investors are much more digitally ‘savvy’ and would often rather transact remotely on a mobile device as opposed to dealing via traditional stockbrokers or wealth managers;
· ‘goodbye to trading hours, hello 24/7/365’ — STOs can trade 24/7/365, as they are designed to be digitised and automated. This means that many of the traditional paper-based administrative regulatory requirements usually carried out by the listed-company, financial analysts, and brokers can be replaced using smart contracts which operate around the clock.
The activity of the IPO market in the US and Europe has been declining over the last few years while the emergence of STOs has been seen as a means of raising capital. As we witness greater institutional engagement (on the back of more digital exchanges and custody and banking services being launched), it will become easier for asset managers to be more active and help increase liquidity, which will be vital for STOs to thrive.
Will IPOs continue to decline as STOs gather momentum? was originally published in The Capital on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Post fetched from this article